Comments on: Getting rid of the DSL model explorer http://www.ticklishtechs.net/2008/07/27/getting-rid-of-the-dsl-model-explorer/ a mostly .NET but also some other cool techs blog Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:01:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: jreq http://www.ticklishtechs.net/2008/07/27/getting-rid-of-the-dsl-model-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-1329 jreq Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:17:17 +0000 http://www.ticklishtechs.net/2008/07/27/getting-rid-of-the-dsl-model-explorer/#comment-1329 It certainly seems to be working perfectly for me. Well, thanks again. It certainly seems to be working perfectly for me. Well, thanks again.

]]> By: Benjamin Schröter http://www.ticklishtechs.net/2008/07/27/getting-rid-of-the-dsl-model-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-1328 Benjamin Schröter Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:55:31 +0000 http://www.ticklishtechs.net/2008/07/27/getting-rid-of-the-dsl-model-explorer/#comment-1328 I cant say it for sure, but I don't think the DSL tools will generate the three lines of XML again. For me it seems that the DSL Tools support a missing Explorer everywhere but in the editor itself. All generated code will be generated in a way that is working with proper comments if the explorer is missing, so I think everything will be fine. I cant say it for sure, but I don’t think the DSL tools will generate the three lines of XML again.
For me it seems that the DSL Tools support a missing Explorer everywhere but in the editor itself. All generated code will be generated in a way that is working with proper comments if the explorer is missing, so I think everything will be fine.

]]> By: jreq http://www.ticklishtechs.net/2008/07/27/getting-rid-of-the-dsl-model-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-1327 jreq Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:47:22 +0000 http://www.ticklishtechs.net/2008/07/27/getting-rid-of-the-dsl-model-explorer/#comment-1327 Thank you, I was wondering this myself ;-) Just one question if you happen to read this. Might there be any circumstance under which those lines might be automatically regenerated by DSL Tools? Thank you, I was wondering this myself ;-)

Just one question if you happen to read this. Might there be any circumstance under which those lines might be automatically regenerated by DSL Tools?

]]>