Asymmetric encryption / public key encryption / RSA

Tags:
Add comments

It took me a lot of time to find a neat explanation of asymmetric encryption. Many sides say “a message is encrypted using a public key and it can only be decrypted with a corresponding private key.” Okay, fine, but how does it work in detail? Finally I found the RSA-entry in wikipedia. It’s almost what I was looking, but there are still lots of links to mathematical definitions and calculations you can’t do with your pocket calculator. So I decided to write a little compilation of the presented algorithm and to apply it using numbers you can handle. Also small number help to clarify things – but keep in mind that all the numbers are much much much greater in serious encryption.

How do we get our private-and-public-key-pair?

  1. Choose two distinct (large) random prime numbers p and q
    p = 7,   q = 3.
  2. Compute n = p*q. This n is used as the modulus for both the public and private keys
    n = 7*3 = 21.
  3. Compute the totient: phi(n) = (p-1)(q-1)
    phi(21) = (7-1) * (3-1) = 12.
  4. Choose an integer e such that 1<e<phi(n) and that e and phi(n) share no factors other than 1 (i.e. e and phi(n) are coprime.). e is released as the public key exponent.
    In order to chose an e I will factorize my phi(12) first: 12 = 2*2*3.
    I chose e=5. e does not necessarily have to be prime but it makes it easier to avoid sharing a factor.
  5. Compute an integer d to satisfy the congruence relation d*e mod phi(n) = 1; d is kept as the private key exponent.
    “congruence relation” sounds more complicated than it actually is: Take two different numbers and apply the same modulo-operation to them (like mod 3). If the result is the same for both you may call your integers congruent modulo 5.  Like 11 and 16 are congruent modulo 5, since 11 mod 5 = 1 and 16 mod 5 = 1.
    So we are looking for a integer d that fits into
    d * 5  mod 12 = 1.
    I needed some tries here and wrote some lines to find the lowest d = 5. With one d found you can find all but just adding 12 :-). I didn’t want to take 5 as the private key exponent, since having the same exponent for encryption and decryption is… well… stupid. So I’ll choose 17.
    17 * 5 mod 12 = 1.
    85 mod 12 = 1.  Correct!

Do we have our private and our public key now? Yes, we have. Note that a key is not one single number but a pair of two numbers. Both are needed in the processes of encryption und decryption. One is the exponent and the other the modulus. Just a second and you’ll see why.

public key: e =5 (exponent) / n = 21 (modulus).

private key: d = 17 (exponent) / n = 21 (modulus). 

Let’s encrypt something

We have given our public key to anyone we know. And we kept our private key hidden somewhere under the bed. Now a beautiful and clever girl named Alice wants to send me a message. Fortunately the letters of her message can be represented as a stream of bits and we interpret this stream as a number. So her message is 10. It is important that her message is lower than our modulus, we’ll later see why. Let’s call her original message m and the encrypted message c.

m=10

The encryption it a simple formula: c = m^e mod n.

c = 10^5 mod 21

c = 100000 mod 21

c = 19.

So Alice hands me a little note saying “19”. 19? What the hack is that supposed to mean?

Now the magic happens

I rush back home to find my private key and apply it to “19”

The formula for the decryption look very similar: m = c^d mod n.

m = 19^17 mod 21.

m = 5480386857784802185939 mod 21. (Try it using calc.exe)

m = 10!

 

Wow! Alice says “10” to us. Isn’t 10 the international code for “I would like to date you?” I think so.

 

Signing

To encrypt with the public key means you can decrypt only with the private key. The converse is also true – to encrypt with the private key means you can decrypt only with the public key. Try it!

How can utilize this? We can use it to guarantee that a message is from a specific sender.

I have been dating Alice for some time now and we are used to leave messages to each other at a hidden place. Unfortunately another girl – Eve – is very jealous and has spied our secret mailbox. One week ago she found a message from Alice to me. She couldn’t read it, but she threw it away and replaced it by a mean offense against me. She encrypted it using my public key (which is public 🙂 ) and I thought it was written by Alice. The message started a little fight but luckily we found about Eve’s intention and started signing our messages. Now we transfer messages like this:

  1. Alice writes me a message m.
  2. She encrypts m using my public key, the result is c.
  3. Now she encrypts c using her own private key, the result is cs (c signed)
  4. She leaves me the message
  5. I decrypt cs using her public key, getting c. (Eve can do this as well – but that’s it. She can’t read c and she can’t leave me a fake cs because she doesn’t have Alice’s private key.
  6. I decrypt c using my private key and get back m – bingo!

 

Padding

Breaking this code (meaning “decrypt without having the private key”) is always a lot of work and hard trying. But is becomes much easier, when you know that m is short. That’s because you only have check that little fraction of configurations where m = c^d mod n leads to small ms. To avoid this small messages are artificially made longer until they are close to n. That process is called padding and even padding can be a tricky task.

Last question

We know what happens to short messages. But what happens to long messages? It is obvious that messages – seen as a number – can’t be greater than n-1, since the mod n – part of the decryption formula will never return values >n-1. I guess the message is split up in parts, but couldn’t find a satisfying answer. If I do, I’ll let you know.

 

Take care, 
Bob

2 Responses to “Asymmetric encryption / public key encryption / RSA”

  1. Jan Says:

    Hi Bob,
    based on how you approach the math problem, I find it amazing taking to consider that I am not a math whiz. Anyway, I have a math problem and hoping if you could shed light on it. Just try. Actually this concerns hexadecimal values.

    Consider this,
    I have a string of hex values, I receive from a particular device as stated below:

    #1 Data:
    20 02 1e 00 01 3f 01 1d 01 00 02 3f 52 00 01 00 02 3f 52 6d 20 33 00 00 42 61 74 68 00 00 00 00 01 03 03 03 29 3f 09 3f 02 00 08

    #2 Data:
    20 02 1e 00 01 3f 01 11 01 00 02 3f 52 00 01 00 02 3f 52 6d 20 33 00 00 42 61 74 68 00 00 00 00 01 03 03 03 29 3f 09 3f 02 00 08

    #3 Data:
    20 02 1e 00 01 3f 01 15 01 00 02 3f 52 00 01 00 02 3f 52 6d 20 33 00 00 42 61 74 68 00 00 00 00 01 03 03 03 29 3f 09 3f 02 00 08

    Now using this hex value below, would I conclude that the #1 Data: is identical to my last hex value below:

    last hex value:
    20 02 1e 00 01 3f 01 18 01 00 02 3f 52 00 01 00 02 3f 52 6d 20 33 00 00 42 61 74 68 00 00 00 00 01 03 03 03 29 3f 09 3f 02 00 08

    You may or may not reply to me but I was hoping if you found something you could reply me back by any chance..

    Thanks

  2. Rafael Says:

    Nice article. A description of a method that allows both hashing and decryption of asymmetric passwords you can find here http://www.developers-blog.org/blog/default/2009/07/05/Public-Key-based-asymmetic-password-hashing.

Leave a Reply

WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in